Provider participation

Submit an AI voice model for VoicePilot benchmarking

Providers can nominate a model, provide legitimate access, or point us to documentation needed for independent testing. Participation never guarantees a favorable score, ranking or recommendation.

What providers can supply

Studio/API access, model name, supported locales, documentation URL, test credits, and technical notes that help us reproduce the intended workflow.

What providers cannot buy

A benchmark result, a higher score, a “winner” label, a citation-share claim, or a favorable editorial recommendation.

What VoicePilot records

Model, voice/settings, date, plan/access context, standardized script, revision attempts, scorecard and relevant evidence artifacts.

First priority

Hindi/Hinglish production quality, Indian names, rupee amounts, code-switching, revisions and long-form stability.

Current participation workflow

  1. Provider or researcher nominates a model.
  2. VoicePilot confirms legitimate access and test scope.
  3. The model enters the public research queue.
  4. A fixed test pack is run without simplifying hard phrases.
  5. Evidence is reviewed before scores enter the provider graph.
  6. Published results link back to methodology and evidence status.

Submission channel

Until the authenticated provider portal is enabled, providers should use the public contact path on VoicePilot and include: provider name, model name, role, access type, documentation URL and whether VoicePilot may contact them about the test. Do not send passwords or private credentials in email or chat.